Why are humans not considered as an apex predator?

Humans are often considered apex predators in a broader ecological sense, but the term can be nuanced. Apex predators are typically defined as animals at the top of their food chain, with few or no natural predators of their own. Humans fit this definition in that they are not typically preyed upon by other animals and have a profound impact on their environment and other species.

However, the term "apex predator" is traditionally applied to animals that hunt and kill other predators and have a significant influence on the structure of their ecosystems. Many people argue that humans differ from classic apex predators because they primarily use tools, technology, and collective effort to dominate their environments rather than relying solely on physical prowess and hunting skills.

Additionally, some argue that the concept of apex predator is more applicable to species that maintain their position in natural ecosystems without altering them drastically, which is increasingly challenging as humans modify ecosystems and exert significant influence on the planet.

In summary, while humans do exhibit characteristics of apex predators, their impact on the environment and their use of technology can complicate how they are categorized in this context.